PPT ON RECENT ADVANCES IN IMPROVEMENT OF VEGETABLE CROPS IN INDIA |

Summary:

Explore the latest advancements in enhancing vegetable crops in India through genetic improvement, breeding techniques, and the development of F1 hybrids. Discover the use of molecular markers, male sterility, and cytoplasmic genic male sterility for hybrid seed production in various vegetable crops.

PPT Slide 1

  • Welcome

PPT Slide 2

  • RECENT ADVANCES IN IMPROVEMENT OF
  • VEGETABLE CROPS IN INDIA
  • Credit Seminar II (VSC-692)
  • Presented by:Aditika
  • H-14-33-D
  • PhD IInd year

PPT Slide 3

  • Need for improvement of vegetable crops
  • To
  • develop
  • varieties
  • Higher yield and
  • better quality
  • Photo insensitivity
  • and area of
  • adaptability
  • Resistance to biotic
  • and abiotic stresses
  • Long shelf life and
  • export quality
  • produce
  • Better nutritional,
  • processing quality
  • and seed
  • production

PPT Slide 4

  • Genetic Improvement
  • of vegetable crops
  • Conventional Method Non- Conventional
  • Method
  • Genes for both desirable
  • and undesirable traits
  • Breeders conserve desired
  • ones by repeatedly
  • selection
  • Molecular techniques
  • (selection based on the
  • genotype of marker)
  • Cell and tissue culture
  • technique

PPT Slide 5

  • Breeding methods of vegetable improvement
  • Conventional Methods
  • • Introduction
  • • Pure line selection
  • • Mass selection
  • • Pedigree method
  • • Single seed descent method
  • • Back cross method
  • • Bulk method
  • • Recurrent selection
  • • Heterosis breeding
  • • Synthetic breeding
  • • Clonal Selection etc.
  • Advance Breeding techniques
  • • Mutation breeding
  • • Polyploidy breeding
  • Non conventional methods
  • • Genetic Engineering
  • • Molecular breeding(MAS)
  • • Tissue culture
  • • Somatic hybridization etc.

PPT Slide 6

  • Varieties through introduction in India
  • Crop Introduction
  • Tomato Sioux, Roma, Marglobe, Fire Ball, Best of All, La Bonita, Money Maker
  • Bell pepper California Wonder, Yolo Wonder, World Beater
  • French bean Contender, Kentucky Wonder, Premier
  • Cucumber Poinsette and Japnese Long Green
  • Onion Early Grano, Red Grano, Bermuda Yellow
  • Pea Arkel, Bonneville, Early Badger, Lincoln
  • Cauliflower Snowball-16, Improved Japanese, Early Snowball
  • Cabbage Golden Acre, Drum Head
  • Radish Japanes White, Rapid Red White Tipped, China Red, Red Tail Radish
  • Carrot Nantes, Chanteny
  • Turnip Snowball, Golden Ball, Purple Top White Globe

PPT Slide 7

  • Varieties developed through selection
  • Kalloo G. 1998
  • Pusa Purple Long, Pusa Purple
  • Round, Pusa Purple Cluster,
  • Pant samrat, Arka Sheel
  • Egg Plant
  • NP 46 A, Sindhur, Patna Red Chilli
  • Hara Madhu, Arka Jeet, Arka
  • Rajhans, MH-1
  • Muskmelon
  • Pusa Summer Prolific Long,
  • Pusa Summer Prolific Round
  • Bottle Gourd
  • Pusa Red, Pusa Ratnar, Arka
  • Niketan, Arka Pragati
  • Onion
  • Pusa Katki and Pusa Dipali cauliflower
  • Solan Vajar, Solan Lalima,
  • Solan Red Round, Pusa 120,
  • HS-110
  • Tomato

PPT Slide 8

  • Varieties developed through hybridization
  • Tomato Pusa Ruby, Pusa Gaurav, Pusa Early
  • Dwarf, Arka Meghali, Hissar Anmol,
  • Punjab Chhuhara,
  • Brinjal Pusa Kranti, Hissar Shyamal
  • Muskmelon Pusa Sharbati, Punjab Sunehri
  • Watermelon Arka Manik,
  • Cauliflower Pusa Snowball-1, Pusa Shubra
  • Cabbage Pusa Mukta
  • Carrot Pusa Kesar, Pusa Meghali, Pusa
  • Yamdagini
  • Turnip Pusa Chandrima, Pusa Swarnima, Pusa
  • Kanchan
  • Radish Punjab Safed, Pusa Himani

PPT Slide 9

  • Achievements through conventional breeding
  • in India

PPT Slide 10

  • 1. Development of gynoecious lines in cucumber
  • Shogoin(Gynomonoecious,Peter
  • son and Anhder, 1960)
  • Chance Segregant
  • Gynoecious sex form
  • (Stable moderate temp. and
  • photoperiod)
  • Temperate X Monoecious
  • gynoecious
  • (WI2757)
  • Tropical Gynoecious lines(87-304-
  • 6, 87-316, 87-319-12 and 87-
  • 338-15 )
  • (F1 Phule Prachi, Phule Champa)
  • Parthenocarpic tropical
  • gynoecious line (PKG-1
  • series) in Poona Khira
  • background (More and
  • Badgujar, 1998)

PPT Slide 11

  • Pusa Seedless Cucumber-6
  • •First extra early (40-45 days for first
  • fruit harvest)
  • •Parthenocarpic gynoecious cucumber
  • suitable for cultivation in protected
  • condition.
  • •Average fruit yield is 126 t/ha (1260
  • kg/ 100 m2) during winter season
  • (off-season, November-March).

PPT Slide 12

  • • Polyploid plants are multiples of the basic chromosome
  • number. In vegetable breeding, 1% colchicine solution is used
  • • Colchiploidy is used in Palak and Potato
  • • The well known example of polyploidy is seedless
  • watermelon
  • 4n Seed parent X 2n pollen parent
  • (Tetra-2) (Pusa Rasal)
  • F1 (Pusa Bedana)
  • (Sterile 3n plant)
  • 2. Polyploidy Breeding

PPT Slide 13

  • Continue..
  •  Kerala Agricultural University
  • (KAU), Trichur, Kerala has
  • developed a stable tetraploid
  • line of watermelon ‘KAU-CL-
  • TETRA-1’ through
  • colchiploidy.
  •  Two triploid hybrids i.e.
  • Shonima and Swarna have
  • been developed using this
  • tetraploid line through crossing
  • with diploid males,
  •  namely CL-4 (red fleshed) and
  • CL-5 (Yellow fleshed),
  • respectively.
  • (Vegetable Newsletter,IIVR, 2015)
  • Swarna (Yellow fleshed)
  • Shonima (Red fleshed)

PPT Slide 14

  • 3. Growing vegetables round the year
  • • In Recent past development has been made to
  • develop off-season varieties:
  • Crop Variety Character
  • Tomato Ostenkinskiz, Cold Set, Pusa Sheetal Fruit set at low
  • temperature
  • Hot Set, HS 102, Pusa Hybrid 1 Fruit set at high
  • tempetrature
  • Radish Pusa Chetki, Pusa Desi Made possible to grow
  • throughout year
  • Onion N 53, Agrifound Dark Red, Arka Kalyan,
  • Baswant 780
  • Kharif season
  • Cabbage Green Express, Green Boy, KK Cross,
  • Pusa Ageti
  • Tolerance to high
  • temperature

PPT Slide 15

  • Varieties of carrot for round the year
  • cultivation
  • Variety Sowing time Availability Yield
  • (q/ha)
  • Pusa Vrishti July-August October-Nov. 180-200
  • Pusa Meghali August Nov.-Dec. 220
  • Pusa Rudhira , Pusa Asita, Pusa
  • Vasuda
  • Sep.-Oct. Dec.-Jan. 300-350
  • Pusa Yamdagini, Pusa
  • Nayanjyoti
  • Sep.-Nov. Dec.-Feb. 270-320
  • Pusa Yamdagini Dec.-Feb. March-May 200-250
  • Pusa Yamdagini, Pusa
  • Nayanjyoti, Nantes, Pusa Vrishti
  • March-April June- July 130-150
  • Indian Horticulture, 2015

PPT Slide 16

  • Pusa Rudhira Pusa Asita
  • Pusa Vrishti Pusa Vasuda

PPT Slide 17

  • 4. F1 Hybrids
  • Crop F1 Hybrid Genetic Mechanism
  • Cabbage KGMR-1(Pusa cabbage Hybrid 1),
  • KTCBH 51, KTCBH 81
  • SI
  • Cauliflower Pusa Hybrid-2, Pusa Kartik Sankar SI
  • Cabbage KCH-5, Hybrid 991-5, Hybrid 854-6 CMS
  • Cauliflower Hybrid 8401 ×31022 CMS
  • chilli Arka Sweta, Arka Meghna, Arka Harita,
  • Arka Khyati, Kashi Surkh, CH-1, CH-3
  • CGMS and GMS
  • Onion Arka Kirthiman, Arka Lalima CMS
  • Carrot Pusa Nayanjyoti, Pusa Vasudha CMS
  • Cucumber Solan Khira Hybrid-1, Solan Khira
  • Hybrid-2
  • Gynoecious based F1
  • hybrids

PPT Slide 18

  • 5. Edible colour rich varieties of
  • vegetable crops
  • Crop Variety Pigment
  • Carrot Pusa Ashita Anthocyanin
  • Paprika KTPL-19 Capsanthin
  • Amaranthus Pusa Lal Chaulai Anthocyanin
  • Red cabbage Red Cabbage Anthocyanin
  • Purpule headed Broccoli Palam Vichitra Anthocyanin
  • Carrot Pusa Ridhira Lycopene
  • Pusa Vrishti Lycopene
  • Pusa Yamdagini Carotene
  • Pusa Nayanjyoti Carotene
  • Tomato Pusa Rohini Lycopene
  • Pritam Kalia , 2012

PPT Slide 19

  • 6. Cauliflower : Pusa Betakesari
  • •This is the first ever indigenously bred
  • bio-fortified beta carotene (800 – 1000
  • µg/100 g) rich cauliflower variety, an
  • attempt to tackle beta carotene
  • deficiency related malnutrition problem
  • in India
  • •Its curds are orange coloured, compact
  • and very attractive
  • •It is suitable for September – January
  • growing period

PPT Slide 20

  • Resistance breeding
  • Need???
  • Vegetables Biotic Stresses
  • Residual effect
  • Health Hazards, reduced
  • export potential
  • Resistance breeding
  • Dr. G. Kalloo, Vegetable breeding

PPT Slide 21

  • Vegetable varieties resistant to diseases in
  • India
  • Crop Disease Variety
  • Eggplant
  • Bacterial wilt
  • Pant Rituraj
  • Pusa Purple Cluster
  • Bacterial wilt and Phomopsis
  • blight
  • Pant Samrat
  • Pusa Bhairav
  • Tomato
  • Bacterial wilt BWR-5
  • Verticilium wilt and Fusarium
  • wilt
  • Pant Bahar
  • Root Knot Nematodes
  • Sel-120
  • PNR-7
  • Leaf curl
  • H-24, H-36
  • Yashwant
  • Capsicum
  • Bacterial wilt Arka Gaurav
  • Phytophthora rot Solan Bharpur (Tolerant)
  • Chilli
  • Multiple disease resistant
  • (Anthracnose, leaf curl, TMV,
  • CMV)
  • Punjab Lal

PPT Slide 22

  • Continue..
  • Crop Disease(s) Variety
  • Okra YVMV
  • Arka Anamika
  • Arka Abhay
  • Parbhani Kranti
  • Watermelon Anthracnose, PM and DM Arka Manik
  • Muskmelon
  • Powdery mildew Arka Rajhans
  • PM and DM Punjab Rasila
  • Cabbage Black rot Pusa Mukta
  • Cauliflower Black rot
  • Pusa Shubra
  • Pusa Snowball K-1
  • Pea
  • Powdery mildew
  • FC-1
  • JP-83
  • PRS-4 and PM-2
  • Powdery mildew and rust
  • Mithi Phali
  • Solan Nirog
  • JP-4
  • French bean Angular leaf spot SVM-1

PPT Slide 23

  • Varieties resistant to abiotic stresses in India
  • Crop Stress Variety
  • Tomato
  • Low temperature Pusa Sheetal
  • Drought
  • Solan Vajr, Arka
  • Meghali
  • High temperature
  • HS-101, HS-102 and
  • Pusa Hybrid 1
  • Salinity Pusa Ruby
  • Onion Salinity Hisar-2

PPT Slide 24

  • Conventional
  • breeding
  • increasing population,
  • decline in agricultural
  • resources such as land and
  • water, and the apparent
  • plateauing of the yield curve of
  • the staple crops
  • Modern Plant breeding is a multi-
  • disciplinary and coordinated approach
  • Number of tools and elements of conventional breeding
  • techniques, bioinformatics, biochemistry, molecular
  • genetics, molecular biology and genetic engineering,
  • utilized and integrated

PPT Slide 25

  • Biotechnology as a tool for vegetable
  • improvement

PPT Slide 26

  • Transgenics or GM
  • Crops
  • Genetic diversity studies
  • Evolutionary studies
  • Anther culture
  • Embriyo Culture
  • Protoplast Fussion
  • Molecular mapping
  • To prepare saturated genetic map
  • Chromosome identification
  • Micro Propagation
  • Meristem Culture
  • Marker Assisted Selection
  • QTLs
  • Disease resistance
  • Construction of genetic maps
  • Biotechnology for
  • vegetable improvement
  • Genetic Engineering Molecular Markers Tissue Culture

PPT Slide 27

  • Genetic Engineering
  • • Deliberate alteration of genome of an organism by
  • introducing one or few specific foreign genes
  • • GE crops are Transgenic crops or Genetically
  • modified (GM) crops and the gene introduced is
  • referred as transgene
  • • Creation of transgenic plants require tools of
  • biotechnology and those of conventional breeding
  • • GE supplements but not supplants breeding

PPT Slide 28

  • Genetically modified Horticultural crops under large
  • scale production
  • Crop Transgenic trait Transgene
  • Tomato Suppression of PG
  • (Polygalactronase) to delay
  • fruit ripening
  • Antiscense construct based
  • on pTOM6 for
  • polygalactronase enzyme
  • Squash (Zucchini) Resistant to watermelon,
  • cucumber, and zucchini
  • yellow mosaic viruses
  • Virus coat protein
  • Sweet pepper Resistance to viruses Virus coat protein
  • Sugar beet Resistant to glyphosate
  • herbicide
  • Soyabean Resistant to glyphosate
  • herbicide
  • Glyphosate resistant
  • bacterial EPSPS gene, bar
  • gene
  • Bhojwani SS and Dantu PK. 2013

PPT Slide 29

  • Application of GM crops
  • Resistance to biotic
  • stresses
  • • Disease resistance
  • • Insect Resistance
  • Resistance to abiotic
  • Stresses
  • • Drought resistance
  • • Salt resistance
  • • Heavy metal resistance
  • • `Cold tolerance
  • • Frost tolerance
  • • Resistance to
  • herbicides
  • • Induction of
  • engineering male
  • sterility
  • • Nutritional quality
  • improvement

PPT Slide 30

  • Resistance to biotic stress
  • Crop Trait Gene/ lines resistance
  • Cabbage DBM Cry 1A
  • Tomato Early Blight (Arka
  • Vikas)
  • Trichoderma hazarianum chitinase
  • gene
  • Late Blight PGIP gene
  • Potato ToLCNDV GTLC2-127 and KPLC2-53 lines
  • Watermelon Bud Necrosis Transgenic watermelon cv. Arka
  • Manik
  • IIHR and CPRI annual reports, 2015

PPT Slide 31

  • Abiotic stresses resistance
  • Drought tolerance in tomato:
  • • A novel gene likely to confer drought tolerance, cloned from
  • a drought tolerant land race of sorghum M-35-1, was used
  • for transformation of tomato. Average number of fruits and
  • average yield per plant was higher than control varieties.
  • • In Network Project on Transgenic Crops at IIVR (NPTC),
  • water-deficit stress tolerant transgenic tomato was developed
  • using AtDREB1A gene.
  • • Another BcZAT12 transformed tomato line was useful for
  • improving its quality in heat, drought or salt stressed
  • conditions.
  • Source Annual report IIVR 2012-13 and 2013-14

PPT Slide 32

  • Salt stress tolerant transgenic tomato cv. Kashi
  • Vishesh – AtDREB1A gene
  • The salt stress exposed transgenic tomato plants
  • recorded :
  • I. higher relative water content,
  • II. lower membrane damage indicated by lower
  • electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation
  • (MDA) compared to the non-transgenic (WT)
  • plants.
  • • Over-expression of rd29A:AtDREB1A/ CBF3
  • imparted lower susceptibility to salt stress.
  • IIVR Annual Report 2014-15

PPT Slide 33

  • Marker Assisted Selections
  • • MAS refers to the use of DNA markers that are
  • tightly-linked to target loci as a substitute for
  • or to assist phenotypic screening.
  • • Marker-assisted selection (MAS) provided a
  • potential for increasing selection efficiency by
  • allowing for earlier selection and reducing
  • plant population size used during selection

PPT Slide 34

  • Genome Sequencing
  • How next generation sequencing helps crop improvement:
  •  To develop millions of novel markers, as well as the
  • identification of agronomically important genes (Edwards &
  • Batley 2010)
  •  Enabled the development of high-density genetic maps
  •  The sequence data obtained will help to identify the genes
  • determining different traits
  •  These data enable the unravelling of the regulatory
  • mechanisms behind different traits, and help to elucidate the
  • complete pathway

PPT Slide 35

  • Sequenced crop Genome
  • S.
  • N.
  • Crop Haplod
  • chr. no.
  • Estimated
  • genome
  • size (Mb)
  • No. of gene
  • prediction
  • References
  • 1 Cucumber 7 367.00 26,682 Huang et al. (2009)
  • 2 Musk melon 12 450.00 27,427 Gonzalez et al. (2010)
  • 3 Potato 12 844.00 39,031 The potato genome sequencing
  • consortium (2011)
  • 4 Chinese cabbage 10 529.00 41,174 The Brassica rapa genome
  • Sequencing project consortium
  • (2011)
  • 5 Tomato 12 900.00 34,727 The tomato genome consortium
  • (2012)
  • 6 Water melon 11 425.00 23,440 Gau et al. (2013)
  • 7 Brinjal 12 1126.00 85,446 Hirakawa et al. (2014)
  • 8 French bean 11 587.00 27,197 Schmutz et al. (2014)
  • 9 Chilli 12 3480.00 34,903 Kim et al. (2014)
  • 10 Cabbage 9 630.00 45,758 Liu et ai. (2014)

PPT Slide 36

  • Limitations and future directions of genome
  • sequencing
  • Limitations:
  •  large genome size
  •  polyploidy exhibited by many vegetable crop species impedes the
  • sequencing and further analysis
  •  A high percentage of repeat elements is also a major hurdle in
  • genome assembly
  •  Another challenge is that the functions of many genes identified by
  • genome sequencing remain unknown and the genetic control of the
  • majority of agronomic traits has yet to be determined
  • Future directions
  •  Systematic mining and utilisation of these data would help to
  • develop varieties with higher yield and tolerance to biotic as well as
  • abiotic stresses, and would boost up the economy of tropical
  • countries like INDIA .

PPT Slide 37

  • Other techniques
  • Technique Application
  • Meristem and bud culture Micropropagation for commercial purposes, genetic
  • conservation, and exchange of material
  • Zygotic embryo culture Interspecific crosses
  • Anther and microspore
  • culture
  • Haploid production
  • Protoplast culture Fusion for somatic hybridization

PPT Slide 38

  • Advances in improvement of bulbous
  • crops

PPT Slide 39

  • Breeding achievements and challanges
  •  Continuous cultivation, acclimatization and selection by farmers and researchers
  • have converted onion from long day crop to short day under Indian conditions
  •  Although huge genetic diversity is available in bulb onion, crop improvement
  • progress is not at the pace of other crops (McCallum 2007, Varshney et al.
  • 2012)
  •  Systematic breeding was started with mass selection in various countries during
  • the 19th century, and the discovery of cytoplasmic male sterility paved the way
  • for development of F1 hybrids in the middle of 20th century (Brewster 2008,
  • McCallum et al. 2008).
  •  Sen and Srivastava (1957) attempted to develop F1 hybrids in onion as early as
  • in 1948 using exotic male sterile lines and Indian local male stocks.
  •  The exotic male sterile lines were found unsuitable in the photo periodically
  • different environment in India.
  •  At IARI, the male sterility was isolated in a commercial variety ‘Pusa Red’

PPT Slide 40

  • Continue…
  • Till today in India Arka Kirthiman (MS-65 x
  • Sel.13-1-1) and Arka Lalima (MS-48 x Sel.14-
  • 1-1) two F1 has developed using cytoplsmic
  • genotypes.
  • F1 hybrids dominate in many countries in the
  • world but in India OP varieties dominate

PPT Slide 41

  • Continue..
  • Germplasm:
  • Major gene bank of onion in the world
  • Khosa et al. 2016

PPT Slide 42

  • Marker Assisted breeding
  •  Molecular markers can be used in onion for germplasm
  • characterization and identification of cytoplasmic male
  • sterility in onion for development of hybrids
  •  Male sterile and maintainer lines were identified using
  • molecular markers in three long day onion populations.
  • Molecular markers, 5’cob and orfA501 were able to
  • distinguish effectively normal (N) and sterile (S) cytoplasm
  • in all the three populations (Saini et al. 2015)
  •  An identified molecular marker orf 725 is used to
  • distinguish male sterile and maintainer genotypes
  • maintained at Indian Institute of Horticultural Research
  • Station, Hesaraghatta, Bangalore (Karnataka), India.
  • (Dhanya et al. 2014)

PPT Slide 43

  • Haploid breeding
  • • High heterozygosity in inbred lines resulting from limited (2 or 3) cycle of
  • self-pollination is a major bottleneck in heterosis breeding in onion.
  • • And being biennial in nature require almost 10 years to develop an inbred
  • through conventional method.
  • • DH provides complete homozygosity and phenotypic uniformity.
  • • DH hybrids tested were superior for mean row weight and mean bulb
  • weight creates a pool of experimental hybrids to allow further selection of
  • those hybrids with the preferred quality characteristics. The DH line
  • CUDH066631 performed better than all others (Hyde et al. 2012)
  • • Work is at its embryonic stage in India and is being done at IIHR Bangalore
  • and NHRDF Nashik as well as DOGR Pune .

PPT Slide 44

  • Garlic
  • • The lack of sexuality in garlic limits the increase of variability that
  • is useful for breeding for economically important traits, such as
  • tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress, earliness, yield and quality.
  • Disadvantages of vegetative propagation:
  • a) low multiplication rate,
  • b) expensive and short-term storage that requires wide spaces,
  • c) transmission of phytopathogens through generations
  • • Biotechnological tools such as plant tissue culture can help
  • overcome problems associated with vegetative propagation of garlic,
  • specially the low multiplication rate and disease dispersion

PPT Slide 45

  • Micropropagation
  • • Improved micro
  • propagation protocol for
  • garlic can be utilized for
  • propagation of elite
  • genotype at commercial-
  • scale as one single bulb
  • can give rise to approx.
  • 1200 bulblets (Dixit et al.
  • 2013).

PPT Slide 46

  • Recent advances in improvement of
  • Solanaceous Vegetable crops

PPT Slide 47

  • Challenges for improvement
  • • Resistance to biotic Stresses
  • • Resistance to abiotic stresses

PPT Slide 48

  • Biotic stresses and their source of resistance in tomato
  • Biotic Stress Resistance Sources
  • Tomato Leaf Curl
  • Virus (ToLCV)
  • L. hirsutum f. glabratum, L. peruvianum, L pimpinellifolium and L.
  • hirsutum, HS 101, L. hirsutum (LA386, LA 1777, PI 390513), L.
  • glandulosum (EC 68003) and L. peruvianum (PI 127830 and PI
  • 127831), H-88-78-1, H-88-78-2, H-88-87
  • Fusarium Wilt L. hirsutum f. glabratum (Wir 4172), L. hirsutum (PI 13448) and L.
  • peruvianum (EC 148898),
  • Columbia, Roma, HS 110, Fla. 7547, Fla. 7481
  • Early Blight L. hirsutum (PI 134437), P-1, EC 529061, WIR-3928, H-88-28-1, H-
  • 86-11 and H86-7
  • Bacterial wilt Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium, Acc 99, Sweet 72, Acc 151, Hyb 54,
  • IIHR 663-12-3, BWR 1, BWR
  • 5, LE 79 BT 1, BT-10, H 24, BRH-2, LE-415, H-86, Capitan, Caravel,
  • Ga. 1565, Ga 219, CRA 66
  • Fruit Borer L. hirsutum f. glabratum
  • White fly L. hirsutum and L. hirsutum f. glabratum

PPT Slide 49

  • Biotic Stresses and their Source of Resistance in
  • Brinjal
  • Biotic Stress Resistance Sources
  • Bacterial wilt West coast Green Round 112-8 (WCGR 128-8), S. melongena var.
  • incanum, S. integrifolium, S. torvum
  • Little leaf Solanum viarum, S. incanum, S. sisymbrifolium, Pusa Purple Cluster,
  • Katrai
  • Phomopsis blight S. xanthocarpum, S. sisymbrifolium, S. indicum, S. khasianum, S.
  • nigram, S. gilo, Florida Market,
  • Florida Beauty, BPL-1, Ornamental brinjal, Pusa Uttam, IC-316237
  • RKN Solanum sisymbrifolium, Co-1, Solanum torvum
  • Shoot and fruit
  • borer
  • Solanum sisymbrifolium, S. integrifolium, S. xanthoranpum, S.
  • nigrum, S. khasianum, Pusa Purple Long, H-128, H-129, Azcabey,
  • Thorn Pendy, Black Pendy, Banaras Long Purple.

PPT Slide 50

  • Molecular markers linked to biotic stresses
  • Crop Trait Marker Reference
  • Tomato Fusarium wilt (race
  • 1)
  • SSR (TOM-144) linked to fusarium wilt Parmar et al. (2013)
  • Tomato yellow leaf
  • curl virus
  • STS linked to Ty2 gene Mohamed et al. (2012)
  • RFLP linked to Ty1 Zamir et al.(1994)
  • RKN RAPD linked to Mi gene Williomson et al. (1994)
  • ToMV SCAR based linked to Tm1
  • Ishibashi et al. (2007)
  • Late blight (dTG63) CAPS linked to Ph2 Panthee et al. (2012)
  • Pepper Tomato spotted wilt
  • virus
  • RAPD linked to Tsw Jahn et al. (2000)
  • Potato PLRV Nl271164 (SCAR) linked to Plrv.1 (QTL) Marczewski et al.
  • (2001)
  • PVY RYSC3321 linked to Ryadg (CAPS) Kasai et al. (2000)

PPT Slide 51

  • Multiple disease resistance in tomato
  • • Hybrid-369 with triple
  • disease resistance
  • (ToLCV+BW+EB)
  • • Marker Assisted Selection
  • (MAS) was employed for
  • pyramiding of Ty-2 and Ty-
  • 3 genes into elite tomato
  • lines
  • • Pre-breeding was carried out
  • for introgression of ToLCV
  • resistant genes from
  • Solanum habrochaites.
  • IIHR Annual Report, 2014-15

PPT Slide 52

  • Arka Rakshak: High yielding triple disease resistant
  • tomato F1 hybrid with export potential
  • Breeding line X Breeding Line
  • (IIHR Banglore) (AVRDC Tiwan)
  • Arka Rakshak (ToLCV + BW + EB )
  •  Fruits are medium to large size (80-100g), deep red, very firm with
  • good keeping quality (15-20 days) and long transportability
  •  Bred for both fresh market and processing
  •  Suitable for summer, Kharif and Rabi seasons
  •  Yields 90-100 tons per hectare in 140-150days

PPT Slide 53

  • Molecular markers linked to Male sterility
  • Crop Marker Reference
  • Tomato C4-30 and C2-21 (CAPS)
  • linked to Ps and ps 2
  • (functional male sterile
  • gene)
  • Staniaszek et al. (2012)
  • Chilli RAPD to linked to Rf gene Kumar et al. (2002)

PPT Slide 54

  • Recent advances in improvement of
  • cucurbits

PPT Slide 55

  • Registered germplasm of cucurbits having some unique trait
  • Cucurbit Line National
  • Germplasm No
  • Registered trait
  • Pointed gourd IIVR PG-105 INGR-03035 Parthenocarpic fruits
  • Bitter gourd GY-63 INGR-03037 Gynoecious sex with high yield
  • Watermelon RW-187-2 INGR-01037 High yield and yellow coloured flesh
  • RW-177-2 INGR-01038 Leaf mutant with simple unlobed
  • leaves
  • PBOG-54 INGR-99022 Segmented leaves
  • Cucumber AHC-2 INGR-98017 High yield and long fruit
  • AHC-13 INGR-98018 Small fruit, drought and temperature
  • tolerant
  • Roundmelon HT-10 INGR-99038 Tolerant to downy mildew and root rot
  • wilt
  • Snapmelon AHS-10 INGR-98015 High yield and drought tolerance
  • Rai et al. 2008

PPT Slide 56

  • Gynoecy in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) for
  • exploiting hybrid vigour
  •  The monoecious bitter gourd accessions produce staminate flowers from the
  • start of reproductive phase till crop maturity and thus the staminate to
  • pistillate flower sex ratio in this sex type is relatively high (9:1 to 48:1; 3).
  •  Moreover, it creates difficulty during commercial hybrid seed production
  • due to its extremely small flower.
  •  Use of gynoecious line is an alternative to reduce the cost of hybrid seed
  • production.
  •  Two gynoecious lines (DBGy 201 and DBGy 202) lines have been
  • developed from natural population at IARI (Behera et al. 2006)
  •  The gynoecious hybrid DBGY-201 × Pusa Vishesh showed highest
  • heterosis (-19 %) for earliness and the hybrid DBGY- 201 × Priya was
  • reported to provide maximum heterosis for fruit length, weight and yield.
  • (Dey et al. 2008)

PPT Slide 57

  • Male Sterility in musk melon
  • In India, male-sterile gene ms-1 was introduced in
  • 1978 and used to release two commercial cultivars
  • Punjab Hybrid (Nandpuri et al. 1982) and Punjab
  • Anmol (Lal et al. 2007).
  • This was the first evidence of exploitation of ms-1
  • gene for heterosis breeding in melon.
  • Due to the instability of this ms-1 gene in our sub-
  • tropical field conditions, the seed production of
  • these hybrids has posed numerous problems
  • consistently (Dhatt and Gill 2000).

PPT Slide 58

  • New source of cytoplasmic genic male sterility (CGMS) and
  • restoration of fertility gene in ridge gourd
  •  Two dominant fertility restorer genes (Rf1 and Rf2)
  • either in homozygous dominant or heterozygous
  • dominant condition restores the male fertility in
  • presence of sterile cytoplasm (Arka Sumeet)
  •  This is the first report of cytoplasmically controlled
  • male sterility (CMS) in cucurbits where two dominant
  • male fertility restorer nuclear genes with
  • complementary gene action governed the restoration of
  • male fertility (Kannan et al. 2014)

PPT Slide 59

  • Resistance Breeding
  • Crop Disease Resistance Source
  • Musk melon Powdery mildew PMR 45, PMR 450, PMR 5, PMR 6, PI 124111
  • Downey mildew MR-1, PI 414723, DMDR-1, DMDR-2
  • CGMMV DVRM-1, 2, C. africanus, C. ficifolius, C. anguria
  • Fruit fly C. callosus
  • Nematodes C. metuliferus
  • Watermelon Fusarium wilt Summit, Conqueror, Charleston Gray, Dixilee, Crimson
  • Sweet
  • Anthracnose Fair, Charleston gray, Congo, PI 189225
  • Cucumber Anthracnose PI 175111, PI 175120, PI 179676, PI 182445, wise 2757
  • (USA)
  • Downey mildew B-184, B159, wise 2757 (USA)
  • Powdery mildew PI 200815, PI 200818, C.hardwikkii, Wise 2757 (USA)
  • CMV Wisc SMR-12, SMR-15, SMR-18, wise 2757 (USA)
  • PM and Viruses C. lundelliana, C. martenezii
  • ZYMV, WMV C. ecuadorensis, C. faetidistima, C. martenezii
  • Rai et al. (2008)

PPT Slide 60

  • Continue ..
  • A total of four QTLs (pm1.1, pm2.1, pm4.1 and
  • pm6.1) for PM resistance were identified and
  • located on LG 1, 2, 4 and 6, respectively,
  • explaining 5.2%-21.0% of the phenotypic
  • variation.
  • Anchor markers tightly linked to those loci (<5
  • cM) could lay a basis for both molecular marker-
  • assisted breeding of the PM-resistance gene in
  • cucumber (Zhou et al. 2008)

PPT Slide 61

  • Recent advances in improvement of
  • cole crops

PPT Slide 62

  • F1 hybrids
  • F1 hybrids better to OP Varieties:
  • • Earliness
  • • High early and total yield,
  • • Better curd/head quality in respect of curd/head
  • compactness and colour
  • • Uniform maturity
  • • Better field staying capacity
  • • Wider adaptability
  • • Resistance to disease and insect

PPT Slide 63

  • Exploitation of heterosis
  • Genetic mechanisms :
  • SI: Self-incompatibility is genetically
  • controlled, physiological hindrance to self-
  • fruitfulness or self-fertilization. (SSI- Cole
  • Crops)
  • MS: Male sterility refers to either absence
  • of pollen grain or if present it is non-functional
  • (CMS, GMS, GEMS)

PPT Slide 64

  • Basic steps in use of SSI
  • 1. Identification of self-incompatible plants in diverse
  • population/genotypes.
  • 2. Development of homozygous self-incompatible lines.
  • 3. Identification of S-alleles in the homozygous self-incompatible
  • lines.
  • 4. Establishment of inter-allelic relationships among the S-alleles.
  • 5. Identifying the best combining lines.
  • 6. Maintenance of parental self-incompatible lines.
  • 7. Commercial hybrid seed production.

PPT Slide 65

  • Use of SI lines for hybrid seed production

PPT Slide 66

  • Maintenance of homozygous SSI inbreds
  •  Bud pollination / Sibmating
  •  Treatment with CO2 gas (CO2 enrichment) (Jirik 1985) or sodium
  • chloride ( Kucera 1990)
  • Other methods:-
  • • Electronic aided pollination (EAP); (Roggen et al. 1972)
  • • Steel brush method ( Roggen and Dijik 1972 )
  • • The pollen washing ( Roggen 1974)
  • • Thermally aided pollination (TAP); (Roggen and Dijik 1976)

PPT Slide 67

  • Assessment and problems in exploiting SSI
  • Assessment:
  •  Number of seed set after each specific self- or cross-pollination.
  •  The fluorescent microscopic observations on pollen ability to penetrate
  • style (within 12-15 hr) (Dyki 1978).
  • Problems:
  • • Sib-incompatibility is weak in certain inbreds.
  • • Continuous inbreeding may lead to complete loss of the inbred lines.
  • • Pseudo-incompatibility.
  • • Hybrid seeds would be expensive if the self-incompatible lines are difficult
  • to maintain.

PPT Slide 68

  • Use of CMS for hybrid seed production

PPT Slide 69

  • F1 Hybrids
  • Crop F1 Hybrid Genetic Mechanism
  • Cabbage KGMR-1(Pusa cabbage Hybrid 1),
  • KTCBH 51, KTCBH 81
  • SI
  • Cauliflower Pusa Hybrid-2 (Nov maturing, Group-II),
  • Pusa Kartik Sankar (group-I)
  • SI
  • Cabbage KCH-5, Hybrid 991-5, Hybrid 854-6 CMS
  • Cauliflower Hybrid 8401 ×31022 CMS

PPT Slide 70

  • Tropical hybrids
  • • Most of the high temperature (upto 35◦C) tolerant
  • tropical hybrids are early maturing like Green
  • Boy and Green Express.
  • • Other Hybrids are:
  • i) From Mahyco: Kalyani, Hri Rani
  • ii) IAHS Bangalore: Cabbage -5, Cabbage -6,
  • Bajrang, Sujata, Sucheta, Sarita etc.
  • iii) Sungro: Sungro – 97, Divya

PPT Slide 71

  • Conclusion
  • • Most of the commercial vegetable crops have
  • narrow genetic base in cultivated species.
  • • Therefore, in order to broaden their genetic base
  • wide hybridization following in-vitro and
  • biotechnological approaches should be use to
  • generate genetic stocks with useful traits retrieved
  • from wild relatives which could be employed for
  • breeding desirable varieties/hybrids.

PPT Slide 72

  • Future need
  • • Search for new genes/ new source of resistance to
  • different biotic and abiotic stresses.
  • • Introgression of gene(s) of interest for biotic and
  • abiotic stress mainly in desired commercial
  • backgrounds using biotechnological approaches.
  • • Diversification of sterile cytoplasm using wide
  • hybridization.

PPT Slide 73

  • Thank You
1 / 73
admin
Author: admin

Follow us on Social Media